Home
Latest images
Register
Log in
ashana zahra- Posts : 11
Join date : 2019-09-22
audience: Beliefs, Values, & Needs - Ashana 12E
Thu Sep 26, 2019 5:50 pm
Audience: Beliefs, Values, & Needs
Ashana Zahra 12E
AP 2
1. Article: Angels and Humans Interbreeding
2. The argues that thousands of years ago, humans and fallen angels (Nephilim) once interbred. Holding out evidence that there was indeed, foreign DNA in modern humans today. Genes called human leucocyte antigen or HLA, which were derived from generations of crossbreeding with Denisovans, one of the children of the Fallen Angels. Further claims say, that the interbreeding between humans and these Nephilims, are mentioned in the Bible.
3. Based on my analysis, weaknesses shown in this article can be represented by the claims, not having any proper and stated official research facility or activity. The argument focuses on connecting the dots and trying to fill the empty parts with assumptions, and not further scientific evidence.
4. Audiences reading this article would presumably be, people with passion for fantasy and a drive to prove anything right regarding abnormality, fiction, and otherworldly. Finding new discoveries that would likely be sensational and very impactful to the world. Going as far as trying to prove a non-scientific argument with very few statements and proof from religion-oriented resources, such as the bible. The spectrum of audience for this article is very limited. Due to it not having much scientific proof and proper research arguments.
Ashana Zahra 12E
AP 2
1. Article: Angels and Humans Interbreeding
2. The argues that thousands of years ago, humans and fallen angels (Nephilim) once interbred. Holding out evidence that there was indeed, foreign DNA in modern humans today. Genes called human leucocyte antigen or HLA, which were derived from generations of crossbreeding with Denisovans, one of the children of the Fallen Angels. Further claims say, that the interbreeding between humans and these Nephilims, are mentioned in the Bible.
3. Based on my analysis, weaknesses shown in this article can be represented by the claims, not having any proper and stated official research facility or activity. The argument focuses on connecting the dots and trying to fill the empty parts with assumptions, and not further scientific evidence.
4. Audiences reading this article would presumably be, people with passion for fantasy and a drive to prove anything right regarding abnormality, fiction, and otherworldly. Finding new discoveries that would likely be sensational and very impactful to the world. Going as far as trying to prove a non-scientific argument with very few statements and proof from religion-oriented resources, such as the bible. The spectrum of audience for this article is very limited. Due to it not having much scientific proof and proper research arguments.
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum|
|
|